THE JOMAG TAKE #030 Dominance with Depth
THE JOMAG TAKE #030 Dominance with Depth
Business as it really is.
Why Loud Market Dominance Is Often the Dumbest Kind
Everyone talks about market dominance.
High market share.
Category leadership.
Number one position.
But here’s the uncomfortable truth:
The most dangerous kind of dominance is the one everyone can see.
Because when you look dominant,
you become a target.
Regulators watch you.
Competitors unite against you.
New entrants attack you.
Public sentiment turns.
So smart operators don’t chase visible dominance.
They chase structural dominance.
-
The blindness problem: surface-level dominance
Many founders put on blinders. No depth. Very obvious.
They look at:
• market share
• brand visibility
• top-line leadership
And stop there.
That’s like judging a chess position by how many pieces you have
without seeing the board.
You’re dominant only until the rules change.
-
The battery example (this is game-level thinking)
Let’s say I’m a B2C battery brand.
I have 60% market share.
At face value, that’s dominance.
But I deliberately avoid being seen as a monopoly.
Why?
Because monopolies get attacked.
Instead, I do something quieter.
I:
• encourage sub-brands, not mine and my own
• supply raw materials or key components
• control upstream inputs
• become the supplier to my “competitors”
So while the market sees many brands competing…
Look at Potato Corner before, people ask me what I think about other direct competitors. I smile I and sometimes I say I do not have a problem with or I even say, sometimes, that they are irrelevant.
Why?
Because I also own or co-own some of those direct competitors!
And, sometimes, I supply fries to those I do not even own.
By encouraging:
- sub-branding
- competitors entering your business game or concept
- joint-ventures
You make your game, the concept or the product/service a new category or a strong niche that will last long than just being a fad.
I sit underneath the entire category.
That’s not market dominance.
That’s platform dominance.
No noise.
No spotlight.
No enemies.
Just leverage.
-
This pattern already exists (people just don’t talk about it)
Here are real-world versions of this play:
1) Intel (historically)
Consumers argued AMD vs Intel.
PC brands competed loudly.
But Intel dominated inside the ecosystem.
2) Google (Android)
Multiple phone brands.
Supposed competition.
But the operating system, data, and services sit underneath.
3) Visa & Mastercard
Banks compete.
Cards compete.
But transactions still flow through the same rails.
4) Amazon (AWS)
Retailers compete with Amazon.
Startups compete with each other.
But many run on Amazon’s infrastructure.
Amazon doesn’t need to win the storefront.
It wins the plumbing.
-
Why platform dominance is more powerful
Platform dominance:
• survives price wars
• survives branding shifts
• survives consumer trends
• survives competitors copying you
Because competitors can change tactics
but they can’t escape the system.
It’s dominance without visibility.
And that’s the safest kind.
-
The leadership mindset shift
Most founders ask:
“How do I beat competitors?”
Better question:
“Where can I sit so that everyone depends on me?”
That’s depth perception.
That’s seeing the game in layers:
• consumer layer
• brand layer
• supply layer
• data layer
• infrastructure layer
Real dominance happens below the surface.
-
Why this fits the non-linear leader
This kind of thinking:
• doesn’t look heroic
• doesn’t get applause
• doesn’t trend on LinkedIn
But it wins long-term.
It requires:
• patience
• humility
• comfort with invisibility
• confidence to let others shine
And a deep understanding of how the enterprise actually works.
-
JOMAG VERDICT
Chasing visible dominance makes you loud and vulnerable.
Designing platform dominance makes you quiet and untouchable.
The best position in the game
is not the one everyone sees.
It’s the one everyone unknowingly relies on.
—
JOMAG PRESS
Business as it really is.
Jose Magsaysay Jr
Comments
Post a Comment